A Critical Bound Meeting the Physical and Engineering Requirements for Best Cement Stabilization Effect on Clay–Sand Mixtures

 

Evangelos I. Stavridakis

B.Sc., M.Sc., Ph.D., F.G.S., Lecturer,
Laboratory of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,
Geotechnical Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering,
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
stavrid@civil.auth.gr

ABSTRACT

The use of cement for treating originally unsuitable soils, used in the construction of infrastructural soil works, is a technique which presents a remarkable contribution to the safeguard of environmental wealth.

Conventional cement – stabilization methods are used mainly for surface treatment. However the use of cement has recently been extended to a greater depth in which cement columns were installed to act as a type of soil reinforcement (deep cement – soil mixing). The object is to bind the soil particles together so that a rigid mass will be obtained with high load – bearing strength and resistance to the effects of weathering (durability). Therefore mineralogy of bonding [type of clay (active – inactive) – cement] of cementing material (cement or other cementing additive) is an important property that controls strength and durability.

A great deal of this work, in literature and practice, has proceeded without much consideration of the variations in the mineral compositions of the soils investigated. However, sufficient information is now available for an attempt at a correlation of engineering (strength – durability) behaviour of cement treated soil mass with its clay mineral composition. From this point of view a research was carried out in order to define critical areas of strength and durability meeting the physical and engineering requirements for efficient cement stabilization. For these reasons both slaking and unconfined compressive strength tests were carried out on bentonite – kaolin – sand mixtures stabilized with cement.

Finally triangular diagrams were prepared to study and classify the development of strength, slaking (durability) and liquid limit of cement – stabilized clayey – sand mixtures due to their compaction and mineral composition. A final conclusion derived was that a critical value, of strength, slaking and liquid limit as well as bentonite and sand content was determinative for the development of an efficient cement stabilization area, in triangular diagrams, for each degree of compaction.

Keywords: efficient cement stabilization, critical value, clays, strength, durability.

INTRODUCTION

Geotechnical problems arise in modern urban construction in soft clay owing to its low strength, low durability and high compressibility. In such circumstances, cement is often used as an additive to improve the strength, durability, volume stability and compressibility characteristics of in situ soft clay soils (Lee and Yong, 1991; Bergado et al, 1996; Tatsuoka et al, 1997; O’Rourke et al, 1998). The soil – cement mixing (surface or deep), has been used, for many diverse applications including building and bridge foundations, retaining structures, liquefaction mitigation, temporary support of excavations, water control and structures to protect the natural environment, pollution control by using stabilization/solidification (S/S) techniques that aims to immobilize the source of contaminants (the use of S/S include the improvement of structural properties of the soil and the remediation of contaminated land prior to redevelopment). Additionally ground improvement method of DSM (deep soil mixing) is required to satisfy the following requirements:

- to support building structures (improved bearing capacity – strength),
- to withstand stresses due to seismic events or landslides movements (improved durability – strength),
- to withstand the deterioration of bonds between particles during wetting and drying conditions (improved durability).

Names such as Soil Mixed Wall (SMW), Deep Soil Mixing (DSM) or in present work Cement – Soil Mixing (deep or surface application) more recently have gained wide acceptance in the United States. Each of these methods has the same basis root, finding the most efficient and economical method to mix cement (in some cases fly ash or lime) with soil and to improve the properties of the soil to become more like the properties of soft rock (Kawasaki et al, 1981). From this point of view a research was carried out in order to study and classify the influence of composition of clayey soils on their engineering and stabilization parameters. For these reasons, tests of unconfined compressive strength slake durability and liquid limit were carried out on bentonite – kaolin – sand mixtures stabilized with 4% cement, compacted at 90%, 95% and 100% and cured for 7 days. Triangular diagrams were prepared to reveal the development of strength, slaking and liquid limit through all of these clay mixtures.

Sections of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% bentonite in the triangular diagrams revealed the strong influence of bentonite and sand content on strength, slaking and liquid limit (Stavridakis, 2005). Finally the experimental results indicate, that slake – durability test is useful for soil classification as far as cement stabilization is concerned. Slaking values exhibit strong relation with bentonite content divided the triangular diagrams in areas of minimum and maximum cement stabilization effect. Finally a critical point (limit) was found, in the aforementioned diagrams, with the ultimate values of physical and engineering parameters for each degree of compaction which defines areas with best stabilization effect. From such a classification, the quality of stabilization could be defined in terms of composition and liquid limit of the soils in order to define the proper compaction, curing time and amount of cement to be used.

APPLICATIONS, PERFORMANCE AND MECHANISM OF CEMENT STABILIZATION

Applications of soil – cement mixing technology have recently been further expanded. Such applications have included settlement control of soils, slope stabilization and the formation of composite gravity structures. To design for these applications, the unconfined compressive strength, durability, elastic modulus and shear strength of the soil and soil – cement columns must be determined or estimated. Settlement control of soft or loose soils under service loads can be sufficiently controlled with treatment ratio (ratio of the volume of treated soil to the volume of the soil mass) in the 20% to 35% range (Andromalos, 2000). Also, soil – cement mixing is used in settlement control of soft soils supporting embankments, especially approaching bridges to control the differential settlement between bridge foundations and an embankment.

Soil – cement mixing is sometimes preferred over stone columns, for embankment or structure foundations. Stone columns may not being technically feasible due to inadequate lateral support. In slope stability applications, soil – cement mixing improves the overall shear strength and durability of the soil formation to adequately increase the factor of safety and also the soil – cement columns can force the potential failure surface deeper. Lastly, soil – cement mixing has been applied to construct in – situ gravity structures to support vertical excavations.

Soil – cement mixing is used in several applications as a more economical or improved performance alternative to some traditional and other geosystem methods, such as augercast piles; stone columns; jet grouting; compaction grouting; lightweight fills, and conventional retaining walls. The improvement of the properties of cement – treated soil has been attributed to the soil cement reaction (Mitchell, 1981), which produces primary and secondary cementitious materials in the soil – cement matrix (Kezdi, 1979; Çokca, 2001).

The primary cementitious materials are formed by hydration reaction and comprise of hydrated calcium silicates (C2SHx, C3S2Hx), calcium aluminates (C3AHx, C4AHx), (increase the interparticle bond strength and skeletal cementation) and hydrated lime Ca(OH)2. According to the standard notation used in cement chemistry, C=CaO, S=SiO2, A=Al2O3 and H=H2O.

Secondary pozzolanic reaction between the hydrated lime and the silica and alumina from the clay minerals (increase flocculation) leads to the formation of further calcium silicate hydrates (CSH) and calcium aluminate hydrates (CAH). Conclusively the calcium ions produced by cement hydration convert the clay to the calcium form and tend to intensify the flocculation. The secondary processes enhance the strength and stability of soil – cement by producing additional cementitious matter which increases interparticle bond strength between flocculated clay particles (skeletal cementation). Therefore the effectiveness of stabilization is based mainly on the type of bonding agent (i.e. cement), degree of bonding (% of cement), percentage and type of dominant active mineral (number of positions of exchangeable ions – mineralogical composition which is related to liquid limit) and particle size distribution of soil mass. These factors control strength (bearing capacity) and durability [strength of cement – soil bonds, internal strength (Lindner, 1976)] of the cement stabilized soils.

MATERIALS USED FOR TESTS

If the main object of cement – stabilization is to control the anisotropic engineering behaviour of clayey soils, the Atterberg limits of the natural soils are useful for predicting suitability for stabilization and lesser amounts of stabilizing agent (cement) will be adequate (Croft, 1968).

The Atterberg limits reflect the composition of a soil and in particular the nature and properties of the principal clay mineral (Bell, 1976). The various clay minerals in a clayey soil influence the ease with which it can be slaked (Dhakal et al, 2002) or stabilized with cement. Well organized (well crystallized) soil minerals and kaolinite appear to have little effect on the hydration of cement and hardening proceeds normally by using small amounts of cement. While clay minerals with an expansive lattice (i.e. bentonite), have a profound influence on the hardening of cement and require large amounts of cement, to develop efficient strength and durability (Bell, 1976; Croft, 1967).

For these reasons unconfined compressive and slake durability index tests were carried out on cement stabilized clayey mixtures which consisted of bentonite and/or kaolin and/or sand (Table 1). Commercially available kaolin, natural bentonite and commercial uniform, medium to fine sand (74µm/840µm) with Hazen coefficient 2.19, were used (Table 2).

Finally the particles of most clayey admixtures retained on sieve No 200 (74µm) are less than 65% and they can be described as silt – clay materials in accordance with the Highway Research Board Classification System (Yoder, 1967).

The test programme included 198 (66x3) specimens of unconfined compressive strength as well as 726 (66x11) specimens of slake durability index tests for the clayey mixtures.

SAMPLE PREPARATION AND LABORATORY TESTS

In the slake durability test, the apparatus combines the effect of both soaking and abrasion in order to accelerate the rate of weathering that can be attained by wetting and drying. Oven dried samples are rotated in a steel mesh drum partially immersed in water. The slake durability test also measures a cement – stabilized soil resistance to physical, mechanical and (to some extent) chemical weathering which helps engineers to predict the future behaviour of a cement stabilized soil mass in nature. Also this test contributes to the classification and study of physical and engineering properties of a soil by relating the cement stabilization parameters (% of cement, % of compaction and curing time) with the potential bonds developed between soil grains by cement.

For these reasons in this research work the following tests were performed:

-The slaking (100-Id2) was measured using the device and testing procedure developed by Franklin (Franklin and Chandra, 1972). The cylindrical specimens tested in slake durability test had a diameter of 35.5mm and were 23.7 mm in length.

The slake – durability index (Id2 – second cycle) was calculated as the percentage ratio of final to initial dry sample weight (Table 3). The unconfined compressive strength was measured using a commercially available device named Versa Tester (Soil test Inc.). The cylindrical specimens tested in unconfined compressive test had a diameter of 35.5mm and were 71mm in length.

Table 1. Clayey mixtures designs and their geotechnical characteristics.

The displacement rate was 0.6604 mm/min.

- The specimens were prepared at the optimum moisture contents and maximum dry densities (Standard Proctor test) according to BSI 1377 d2 test 12 and BSI 1924.

- The cylindrical samples were prepared according to ASTM 1632-96.

- The Atterberg limits were estimated according to BSI 1377 (Table 1).

- The 4% cement was selected to give noticeable change in strength and durability between clay – sand mixtures.

Table 2. Index properties of clays.

- A compaction range of 90% to 100% (90%, 95%, and 100%) of Standard Proctor maximum dry density obtained in the laboratory is often specified in field projects. This compaction range was adopted for this study.

- The curing time of 7 days was related to the minimum acceptable compressive strength for satisfactory stabilization (Bell, 1978).

- The clay – sand cement mixtures were cured at approximately 95.5% relative humidity and 21oC temperature.

Table 3. Classification and characterization of durability
(after Franklin and Chandra, 1972).

TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

One of the most common problems confronting the civil engineer is the construction of roads and buildings over very soft or loose soil with low bearing (capacity) strength. Improving engineering properties of a problematic soil (soft or loose) by mixing with admixtures (i.e. cement) is referred to as soil stabilization. The purposes of adding these admixtures to the soil are to increase bearing (capacity) strength and durability, reduce deformability (settlement) and permeability and finally provide volume stability.

Therefore stabilization of soils with cement results in a mixture of pulverized soil, cement and water. The compaction of this mixture, produces a new material (like soft rock), which due to its strength (bearing capacity), favourable deformation characteristics (increased volume stability) and its resistance to water (decrease of liquid limit and plasticity index), is well adaptable as a road pavement, road and building foundation.

This resulting modified soil is an improved soil in unhardened or semi – hardened state (cement – modified soil). This is achieved by using the lower amount of cement. When the cement content is increased, the resulting material is referred to as hardened soil – cement.

For the above mentioned the test criteria should be first durability and second strength but unfortunately while strength is used the durability is absent.

Bonding (clayey soil grains – cement) determines the ease with which microfractures during slaking process, can propagate through the stabilized clay by disrupting the structure and breaking the bonds within the cemented clayey mass.

Durability (slaking), under environmental conditions of wetting – drying and potential stresses (e.g. during seismic events or movements due to landslides), (Tatsuoka et al, 1997) is an aspect of cement stabilized soils, behaviour that has been neglected in favour of other properties such as strength. However it is an important feature of many commonly, encountered engineering problems, in transportation engineering problems (Owttrim, 1988), in dam construction when the dispersive properties of clays (Na-montmorillonite) are not suitable accounted for the design of an earth dam or even in grouts where problems of durability in cement – chemical grouted soil arise by fluctuation of water table (Stavridakis, 2004).

In present research the slake durability test (Franklin and Chandra, 1972) used to predict the potential deterioration of durability (bonding effect) due to climatic wetting and drying. Also this test contributed to the improvement of engineering properties of soil by relating the engineering and stabilization parameters (strength, durability, percentage of cement, compaction, curing time) with the potential bonds developed between soil grains during this improvement by cement.

For these reasons in present research work triangular diagrams were prepared to define areas of efficient cement stabilization and classify the cement stabilized clayey mixtures in durable and non durable through to compaction increment. However the main task of this present work is to determine the variability of a critical bound, in unconfined compressive strength and slaking, necessary to fulfil the requirements for best cement stabilization effect, as the compaction of clay – sand mixtures increases from 90% to 100%.

The triangular diagram of Figure 1 shows the designs and development of clay – sand mixtures, the positions of experimental results of strength, slaking and liquid limit, the sections of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30% bentonite (Figures 9 and 10) and the sections of experimental results.


Figure 1. Representation in a triangle of schemes for the development of Figures 2-11.

Figures 2, 3 and 4 show the development of unconfined compressive strength at 90%, 95% and 100% compaction respectively.


Figure 2. Development of unconfined compressive strength, bentonite content and ultimate liquid limit 40% on clay-sand mixtures compacted at 100%.


Figure 3. Development of unconfined compressive strength, bentonite content and ultimate liquid limit 40% on clay-sand mixtures compacted at 95%.


Figure 4. Development of unconfined compressive strength, bentonite content and ultimate liquid limit 40% on clay-sand mixtures compacted at 90%.

Figures 5, 6 and 7 show the development of slaking at 90%, 95% and 100% compaction respectively.


Figure 5. Development of slaking, bentonite content and ultimate liquid limit 40% on clay-sand mixtures compacted at 100%.


Figure 6. Development of slaking, bentonite content and ultimate liquid limit 40% on clay-sand mixtures compacted at 95%.


Figure 7. Development of slaking, bentonite content and ultimate liquid limit 40% on clay-sand mixtures compacted at 90%.

The triangular diagram of Figure 8 revealed the strong influence of clay minerals bentonite and kaolin on liquid limit values of clayey – sand mixtures, the higher the amount of bentonite and kaolin is the higher the liquid limit.


Figure 8. Development of Liquid limit of clay-sand mixtures.

According to literature clayey soils with liquid limit less than 40% and plasticity index less than 18% are stabilized successfully by using economical amounts of cement (Godin, 1962).

The above mentioned soils, pass the erosion tests successfully (material loss 7-14% in 12 cycles of Freezing and Thawing or Wetting and Drying test as described in ASTM D560-03 and ASTM D559-03 respectively), (Akpokodje, 1986; Croft, 1967; PCA, 1959).

Means and Parcher (1963), Croft (1968) suggest that soils with large liquid limit (>60%) and plasticity indices (>25%) invariably contain expansive clay minerals such as montmorillonite and react with large amount of cement.


Figure 9. Sections a, b, c according to Figure 2, 3 and 4 respectively.

- Influence of bentonite and sand on unconfined compressive strength of clay mixtures stabilized with 4% cement, compacted at 100% (a), 95% (b), 90% (c) and cured for 7 days.

Figure 9 shows the influence of sand, bentonite and degree of compaction on the development of unconfined compressive strength of clay mixtures. The above results indicate that the greater is the amount of sand the higher is the strength (bearing capacity). Also these figures reveal the negative influence of bentonite content on strength values. Finally Figure 9 exhibits the positive influence of compaction increase on strength. In Figure 9 clay mixtures reveal maximum strength values along the area of 60-65% sand. In particular clay mixtures stabilized with 4% cement, compacted at 100%, 95%, 90% cured for 7 days, exhibit strength values between 4000 kN/m2–1150 kN/m2, (Figure 9a), 3250 kN/m2–750 kN/m2, (Figure 9b), 2416 kN/m2–350 kN/m2 (Figure 9c), respectively.

Figure 10 shows the influence of sand, bentonite and degree of compaction on the development of slaking of clay mixtures. These sections indicate that the greater is the amount of bentonite the higher is the slaking of clay mixtures compacted at 90%, 95% and 100%. Particularly clay mixtures stabilized with 4% cement, compacted at 100%, 95%, 90%, cured for 7 days, exhibit slaking values between 38-60%, (Figure 10a), 46-62.5%, (Figure 9b), 53-70% (Figure 10c) respectively. In Figure 10 clay mixtures reveal minimum slaking values along the area of 60-65% sand. Additionally the amount of sand has a contradictory effect on slaking in relation to unconfined compressive strength (Koncagül and Santi, 1999), from 0% to 20% of sand; the strength increases (Figure 9) and slaking also increases (Figure 10).


Figure 10. Sections a, b, c according to Figure 5, 6 and 7 respectively.

- Influence of bentonite and sand on slaking of clay mixtures stabilized with 4% cement, compacted at 100% (a), 95% (b), 90% (c) and cured for 7 days.

It is obvious that 4% cement is not enough to control slaking in cement stabilized clay mixtures compacted at 90%, 95%, and 100% containing 0-20% sand, 15-30% bentonite and kaolin. On the contrary to the above, in clay mixtures contained sand from 20% to 60-65% the cement stabilization proceeds normally, the strength is increased and slaking is decreased as the amount of sand increases.

Also it seems that in the area of bentonite content from 0% to 15% the increase of sand content doesn’t influence the slaking values (bonding effect) which remain constant through all mixtures of this area (Figures 5, 6, 7 and 10). It is obvious that 4% cement is enough to control slaking in clay mixtures containing 0-65% sand, 0-15% bentonite and kaolin, compacted at 90%, 95% and 100%. Normally the amount of bentonite, in sand – bentonite mixture used as a barrier constitutes 4-13% of the dry weight of this sandy material (Sällfors and Öberg, 2002). Greater amounts of bentonite tend to form around the sand grains and the mixture becomes plastic and consequently difficult to compact developing simultaneously low strength and durability. Consequently the above referred limits of bentonite and sand define areas of mixtures for efficient cement stabilization and classify the cement stabilized clay mixtures in durable and non durable. By comparing the triangular diagrams (Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5, 6, 7) with the section diagrams (Figures 9 and 10) a critical bound was revealed, consisted of 40% liquid limit and bentonite, sand content of 15% and 20% respectively. This bound determines the classification of clayey – sand mixtures and characterization of their strength and durability for efficient cement – stabilization at each compaction level (Figure 11) as follows:

- Clay mixtures stabilized with 4% cement, cured for 7 days, contained 15% of bentonite and 20% of sand, revealed liquid limit =40% and compacted at 100%, 95% and 90% exhibit minimum acceptable strength value of 2375kN/m2, 1750 kN/m2, 1100 kN/m2 and maximum acceptable slaking value of 60%, 62.5%, 70% respectively, for best cement stabilization effect.

According to the afore-mentioned in dense state, a cement stabilized soil will exhibit higher strength values than in a loose one because the first has more clay particles packed into a unit volume than in the second.


Figure 11. Classification in areas of clayey-sand mixtures for efficient cement stabilization at 90%, 95% and 100% compaction.

In compacted cement stabilized problematic soil the greater the degree of compaction is the greater the bearing capacity (unconfined compressive strength).

The afore-mentioned values of developed strength correspond to various slaking values related to different degrees of compaction; the greater the degree of compaction is the lower the slaking. This is attributed to the developed potential cement bonds between soil grains, during cement stabilization and their capacity to resist disruptive forces developed from a dominant swelling mineral such as bentonite in present research work. Additionally clay – sand mixtures with 30% of bentonite (lower bound) cured for 7 days and compacted at 90%, 95% and 100% exhibit the lower range of strength values between 350 kN/m2- 800 kN/m2, 750 kN/m2-1656 kN/m2, 1150 kN/m2- 2100 kN/m2 respectively and extremely high slaking between 85-100% (complete disintegration).

In relation with the above mentioned Figures 2, 3, 4 and 5, 6, 7 yield sufficient information on “antithesis” between strength and slaking values. This means that for safety reasons in construction works the slaking (durability) should be considered as a serious safety factor together with the strength especially in environmental conditions of wetting – drying or soaking and initiation of potential horizontal stresses (i.e. during seismic events or movements due to landslides).

A combination of areas with the afore-mentioned minimum acceptable strength and maximum acceptable slaking, liquid limits less than 40% or between 40% and 60% with the areas of clay – sand mixtures consisted of 15% or 15% to 30% bentonite content and developed at 90%, 95%, and 100% compaction levels, (Figure 11) reveals useful information on the percentages of active, inactive and sandy portion of these mixtures that could be used in specific applications for protection of structures or environment such as soil – mixing (deep or surface), control of water flow through soil or even improvement of geotechnical properties of swelling soils.

Additionally these limits define a critical bound in each compaction level meeting the physical and engineering requirements for best cement stabilization effect of clayey – sand mixtures by using economical amounts of cement.

CONCLUSIONS

REFERENCES

  1. Akpokodje, E., G. (1986) “A method of reducing the cement content of two stabilized Niger delta soils.” Q. J. Eng. Geology, London, Vol. 19, pp359-363.
  2. Andromalos, B. K., A. Y. Hegazy and H. B. Jasperse (2000) “Stabilization of Soft Soils by Soil Mixing.” Soft Ground Technology Conference, United Engineering Foundation and ASCE Geo-Institute, Noorwijkeront, Netherlands, May 28 – June 2.
  3. ASTM D.559-03 “Standard Test Methods for Wetting and Drying Compacted Soil – Cement Mixtures.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
  4. ASTM D.560-03 “Standard Test Methods for Freezing and Thawing Compacted Soil – Cement Mixtures.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
  5. ASTM D.1632-96 “Standard Practice for Making and Curing Soil – Cement Compression and Flexure Test Specimens in the Laboratory.” American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, USA.
  6. Bell, F. G. (1976) “The influence of the Mineral Contents of clays on their stabilization by cement.” Bulletin of the Association of Engineering Geologists Vol.XIII, No4, pp.267-278.
  7. Bell, F. G. (1978) “Foundation Engineering in Difficult Ground.” Butterworths – London.
  8. Bergado, D., T., L. R. Anderson, N. Miura, and A. S. Balasubramaniam (1996) “Soft Ground Improvement in Lowland and Other Environments.” New York: ASCE Press.
  9. BSI 1377. “Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes.” British Standards Institution, 2 Park Street, London, UK.
  10. BSI 1924. “Methods of Test for Stabilized Soils.” British Standards Institution, 2 Park Street, London, UK.
  11. Çokca, E. (2001) “Use of Class C Flyashes for the Stabilization of an Expansive Soil.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE 127(7):568-573.
  12. Croft, B. J. (1967) “The influence of soil mineralogical composition on cement stabilization.” Geotechnique, 17:119-135.
  13. Croft, B. J. (1968) “The problem in predicting the suitability of soils for cementitious stabilization.” Engineering Geology an International Journal Vol 2 (6) 1968 pp.397-424.
  14. Dhakal Ganesh, Yoneda Tetsuro, Kato Masaji, Kaneka Katsuhik (2002) “Slake durability and Mineralogical properties of some pyroclastic and sedimentary rocks.” Engineering Geology, Elsevier, 65 (2002), 31-45.
  15. Franklin, J. A. and R. Chandra (1972) “The slake durability test.” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sc. Vol. 9, pp.325-341.
  16. Godin, P., M. (1962) “Emploi et perspectives de la stabilization au ciment en technique routière.” Annales de l’institut technique du bâtiment et des travaux publics. No 169, pp.38-64 (in French)
  17. Kawasaki, T. A. Niina, S. Saitoh, Y. Suzuki, and Y. Hohjyo (1981) “Deep Mixing Method Using Cement Hardening Agent.” Proc. of the Tenth Intern. Conf. On Soil Mechanics and Foundation Eng, Vol, pp 721-724.
  18. Kezdi, A. (1979) “Stabilized Earth Roads.” Development in Geotechnical Engineering. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company
  19. Koncagül, C. E. and M. P. Santi (1999) “Predicting the unconfined compressive strength of the Breathitt shale using Slake durability, Shore hardness and rock structural properties.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences 36 (1999) pp.139-153.
  20. Lee, S., L. and K. Y. Yong (1991) “Grouting in substructure construction.” Proceedings of the 9th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 2:41-49, Thailand.
  21. Lindner, E. (1976) “Swelling rock: A review.” Proceedings of Rock Engineering for Foundations and Slopes.” ASCE Vol 1, August 15-18, 1976.
  22. Means, E. B. and V. J. Parcher (1963) “Physical Properties of Soils.” Charles E. Merril Publishing, Columbus, OH.
  23. Mitchell, J. K. (1981) “Soil improvement – State of the art report.” Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering 4: 509-565. Stockholm.
  24. O’Rourke, T. D., MacGinn, A., J., Dewsnap, J. and Stewart, H., E. (1998) “Case history of an excavation stabilized by deep mixing methods.” Geotechnical Special Publication, ASCE 83:41-63.
  25. Owttrim. M. W. (1988) “Erodibility test.” Mainroads Department, Queensland, October 1988, Australia.
  26. Portland Cement Association. 1959. Soil - Cement Laboratory Hand book. Chicago III, USA.
  27. Sällfors, G. and A. L. Öberg – Högsta (2002) “Determination of hydraulic conductivity of sand – bentonite mixtures for engineering purposes.” Geotech. and Geol. Eng. 20, 65-80.
  28. Stavridakis, I. E. (2004) “The effect of soaking conditions on durability, of cement treated clayey – sand admixtures,” Proceedings of 15th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, 22-26 November 2004, Bangkok, pp569-574.
  29. Stavridakis, I. E. (2005) “Presentation and assessment of clay influence on engineering parameters of cement treated clayey mixtures.” Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 10 (2005) Available from ejge
  30. Tatsuoka, F. K. Uchida, K. Imai, T. Ouchi, and Y. Kohata (1997) “Properties of cement - treated soils in Trans –Tokyo Bay Highway Project.” Ground Improvement Geosystems, Tokyo, 1, 37-57.
  31. Yoder, E. J., and M. W. Witczak (1967) Principles of Pavement Design, 2nd Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc., 736 pp.

 

© 2005 ejge